FDA · EMA · BfArM · Swissmedic

Audit readiness and validation execution for Pharma-Operations.

Pre-inspection walkthroughs, accelerated validation programmes and an experienced on-demand team — when the FDA, EMA or BfArM inspection comes into view, or when a validation programme needs traction.

Book a 30-min strategy call
audit pass rate
100%
critical findings
0
validated systems
60+
years of practice
15+
01 Inspector perspective

Three layers the inspector walks — Documents, Process, People.

Audit findings rarely sit in one layer alone. We prepare your team across all three — the binder, the workflow, the interview.

Validation Master Plan, risk logs, CAPA-tracker, audit-trail-review records, change-management decisions. The first things an inspector requests — and the first place gaps appear.

  • Validation Master Plan + Risk Register
  • Audit-trail-review records + escalation paths
  • Change vs. configuration — clean separation
  • Deviation closure log with rationale

Inspector observe how decisions actually flow. Who escalates? Who signs off? How is a deviation captured at 02:00 on a night shift? The process must hold up under field-investigator scrutiny.

  • Decision flow + escalation paths
  • Deviation handling at shift boundaries
  • Four-eyes review with clear roles
  • Real-time vs. retrospective documentation

Inspector evaluate consistency across interviews. The QC tech, the validation lead, the QA director — do they tell the same story about how the system works? People-layer mismatches are the most expensive findings.

  • Cross-role consistency rehearsal
  • Training records + qualification logs
  • Top-10 risk Q&A rehearsal
  • Inspector body language + de-escalation
02 Pace & compliance

Programme stuck? Tempo without compliance debt.

When a validation programme loses pace, the symptoms are predictable: test scripts grow, CAPA backlog grows, vendor releases stall. We address the causes — and measure where it sticks.

Project runtime saved
− 50 %

From 12–18 months to 6–9 months — risk-based scoping plus parallel application, compliance and business workstreams

Script effort reduced
− 60 %

Test depth follows risk, argued per script (GAMP 5 Second Edition · Critical Thinking)

Audit dossier complete
100 %

Documents · workflows · interview-prep — 0 critical findings across our last 60+ projects

The four levers we pull

Risk-based test scoping

Test depth follows risk — argued, not counted (GAMP 5 Critical Thinking).

Configuration carries over

Once validated, stays validated — with a documented path through the system landscape.

Parallel workstreams

Application, compliance and business run in parallel — not sequentially.

Routine for vendor releases

4–8 hours per release instead of a full re-validation.

03 Engagement models

Three ways we work together — chosen by you.

Senior-density boutique model — no body-leasing, no junior pools. Pick the engagement that fits your team's bandwidth and your project's pressure.

A

Punctual consulting

Strategy sessions, review calls, second opinion on a validation plan.

Duration
1–5 days
Ideal for
Strategy clarity
Output
Decision document
  • Audit-prep walkthrough
  • Validation strategy review
  • GAMP-5 / Annex 11 gap-walk
Start with a 30-min call →
C

Programme outsourcing

dhc runs a clearly defined slice of your project. Your internal owner stays the decision-maker, your QP keeps full accountability. We deliver and hand over a documented package at the end.

Duration
6–18 months
Ideal for
Full programme rescue
Output
Audit-passed system
  • End-to-end validation responsibility
  • Phase-gate based delivery
  • Documented handover protocol
Scope a programme →
04 Programme reset

When a programme is stuck, diagnosis comes first.

More resources rarely fix a stuck validation programme. Re-sizing the phase gates, mapping stream blockers and re-baselining risk often does. Two weeks, clean output, honest recommendation.

  1. 01

    Stream-by-stream status-mapping

    Each parallel stream (Application, Compliance, Business) gets a current-state read-out. Where is real work happening, where is it blocked, where is it documented but not happening.

  2. 02

    Risk-register audit

    Which entries are real risks with active mitigation, which are compliance theatre, which got entered once and never reviewed again. Honest re-baseline.

  3. 03

    Phase-gate re-sizing

    Original gates were sized for original scope. After 6 months of drift, they need re-sizing. We propose new gates with measurable exit criteria.

  4. 04

    Go / No-Go recommendation

    One document. Three options with cost/timeline/risk. If the original target isn't realistic anymore, we say so directly — and propose what is.

05 FAQ

Things we get asked before the first call.

We have an FDA inspection in 6 weeks. Is that still enough time?
Six weeks is enough for a focused preparation. We start with a one-day walkthrough, identify the top 4–6 risks, document closure paths and run 1–2 mock audits. Honestly: six weeks beats three. With less time we tell you straight what is realistic.
What does a pre-inspection walkthrough cost?
Day-rate based. A walkthrough is typically 1–2 consulting days. A full audit-preparation programme ranges between 8 and 20 days depending on scope.
How quickly can you start an embedded team?
Initial phase typically within 2 weeks — we use the first 14 days to onboard into your tools, your QMS and your audit-trail routines. Full delivery velocity from week 3.
Can you do just the audit preparation, without long-term engagement?
Yes. Model A (Punctual) is designed for that. Many clients start with a one-off audit preparation and decide afterwards whether tighter collaboration makes sense.
How is dhc different from larger validation consultancies?
Boutique model with high senior density. The people you meet in the first call are the ones who later work on the project. No junior pools, no body leasing. Daniel's track record stands personally for the delivery.
Validation backlog accumulated — can that still be cleared cleanly?
Mostly yes, but only with an honest diagnosis first. We don't build compliance theatre. If the backlog goes too far back to close via CAPA, we say so — and propose a re-set.

Let's make your project
audit-proof.

Your project deserves a validation that accelerates go-live — not blocks it. Benefit from the assurance of 60+ successful projects.

60+
Projects
15+
Years
100 %
Audit-Pass
0
Findings
Book a no-strings strategy call

Free initial assessment · Focus on your project, not slides

or
Call directly +49 170 7878065 Mon–Fri 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. Send an email contact@daniel-herrmann.io Reply within 24 h